This blog is born out of the collective interests of a community most keen to discuss, debate or just say something about the issue of healthcare in Singapore. The recent National Day rally speech delivered by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong delves into the subject and raises salient concerns that, we feel, all Singaporeans and interest groups in the healthcare sector should be concerned about.
To present a key points:
- The government is working on a step-down approach of hospital care by cascading care to patients from acute hospitals to community hospitals. The 'twinning of hospitals' has it that a patient who is recovering from treatment in the former will be transferred to the 'sister' community hospital nearby, or literally next-door, where slow medicine is given to reduce the gap to recovery
- The 3M (Medisave, MediShield, Medifund) system is expanded such that Medisave now covers long-term outpatient treatment, MediShield provides higher insurance payouts and Medifund gives more help to the needy to clear outstanding hospital bills
- More (eg. more twinned hospitals) is not the solution to cope with the medical needs of a burgeoning ageing population and low-income families struggling to pay medical bills; the system needs to be structured and adapted properly
- Medical workers involved in controlling the community spread of H1N1--their efforts are lauded in Parliament
- H1N1: there are daily reports of H1N1 infection and/or death cases--how long will it take for people to ride over the epidemic wave, like what happened with SARS? Or is infiltration into the community so rampant and deep that, perhaps, there may be no way we will be able to rid of it?
- Hospitals-twinning programme: the filtering of medical care reduces medical costs for the families and frees up beds in acute hospitals. Exactly how effective is this model of hospital recuperation care? Are medical workers from VWO hospitals (Ren Ci, St. Andrew's) sufficiently equipped and trained to handle patient cases fresh from surgery?
- Citizenry participation: To what extent can a government influence, even control or dictate terms on, how home care for the elderly should be run? Is it fair for a government to impose on caregiving in the privacy of home spaces? How receptive will people be in adopting an attitudinal change in [improving] their lifestyles?
You can also email us at thecommunitychat@gmail.com. Feel free to share with us your views!
3 comments:
A great article! straight to the point, succint yet informative. For someone who missed the rally, this is a good contact point for me to update myself.
Just some thoughts on my end:
no doubt that it caused widespread fear and deaths, SARS brought Sporeans closer together in 2003 and we emerged more knitted as a nation, something we have yet to see from the H1N1 episode. H1N1 is an evolving virus and I would foresee that it will be a longsuffering mutation which may not go away in the short run. Communities just have to get their act together to prepare for the worst.
Healthcare in Singapore is hailed as one of the World's best and just a thought, with the rising cost of medical care, the shortfall of hospital beds, etc, what good would it do if her very own citizens cannot enjoy its fruits of labours? Insurance might be able to help but just how sustainable is this approach?
-- Mr Lee. K.K.
May: Thanks for summarizing the main key points..
仁慈不是最近闹很多风波吗?新加坡政府是否在失信事件和改进国家医药服务结构这两者能作出平衡?
Post a Comment